When the same mistake keeps happening, ask what the process keeps allowing
A mistake happens. Someone fixes it. The team is reminded. Maybe another checklist or review is added. Then it happens again. At some point, the business needs to stop treating the problem as a series of isolated mistakes and investigate the system around the work.
Start with what happened, not who
What should have happened? What actually happened? Where did those paths separate? What information was available? What was missing? What decision was made? What happened immediately before and after?
“Human error” is not always the endpoint
If someone selects the wrong project code from 75 nearly identical options, including inactive codes, “be more careful” may not be the strongest solution. Removing invalid choices may prevent the error more reliably.
Follow the problem upstream
An incorrect invoice may originate in a sales handoff. A late project may originate in intake. A customer complaint may originate in unclear expectations established weeks earlier. Find the point where the error first became possible.
Common causes of recurring mistakes
Unclear process. Unclear ownership. Missing information. Missing or outdated documentation. Training that did not create competency. Systems that make errors easy. Workload or timing that makes the process unreliable. Missing quality checkpoints. Reliance on memory. Or a genuine performance issue after the process, training, resources, and expectations are appropriate.
“We already trained them” is not enough
Distinguish between watched, read, observed, practiced, received feedback, and demonstrated competency. Training activity and ability are not the same thing.
Do not solve every problem with another checklist or approval
Sometimes a system control, required field, clearer ownership, or redesigned process is stronger. Approvals also create time, handoffs, waiting, and manager load, so use them where risk justifies them.
Workarounds are clues
Before banning a workaround, ask what problem it is solving. Employees often create workarounds because the formal process does not fit the actual work.
Look at memory, workload, and timing
If people repeatedly have to remember a recurring requirement, consider whether the workflow should bring the requirement to them. Look at deadline collisions, late inputs, interruptions, approvals, and manual entry too.
Test the change
The simplest reliable change that addresses the actual cause is often better than a complicated fix. Then measure whether recurrence, rework, or delay decreases. If the first solution does not work, that result is new information.
Review & Refine
A process change is not complete because it was implemented. The final R in P.A.R.T.N.E.R. matters: Review & Refine based on what happens in practice. Recurring mistakes are not only frustrating. They are information about your process.
NEED HELP APPLYING THIS?
If the same issue keeps returning after reminders and corrections, BPS can help investigate the process behind it and build a more reliable solution.
Start with a Business Process Assessment